Moslem Scholars Should Not Debate Heretics

Moslem scholars should not debate heretics because this lend legitimacy to them and elevate their status and making these evil people credible. Nothing good ever will come out of such encounters. The heretics usually reverts to their arsenal of insults and that is all. The Muslim haters will feel exalted with these heretic insults and bestow praise on them. No clear and glaring example than the case of Wafa Sultan the heretic and Muslim hater who appeared on the strictly anti-Muslim TV network of Al-Jazeera. Every insult from her get repeated in the cyper space and the videos shown on the You Tube and in the printed media. All what the Moslem scholar said and arguments are ignored. The heretic all what she can say is to describe Islam as barbaric, uncivilized and she uses racist remarks that Islam is the product of desert environment. In another situation the apostates, heretics and self-declared atheist request debates with the rector of a prestigious Al-Azhar Muslim university. Such requests were rejected out of hand. Imagine the Pope debating a catholic apostate or an evangelical preacher like Billy Graham or some one debating person who insults Christianity. The Moslem scholar who debated the filthy and salty mouth Wafa Sultan was a fool and one hopes that there would be no more such fools.
Dr. Ibrahim Al-Khouli, who appeared with this witch on the monstrous Al-Jazeera TV said there was no point in rebuking or debating her, because "she had blasphemed against Islam, the Prophet Muhammad, and the Koran."